Brain Imaging seminars

Genetic targeting of neuronal cells with activity reporters (calcium or voltage indicators) has initiated the paradigmatic transition whereby photons have replaced electrons for reading large-scale brain activities at cellular resolution. This has alleviated the limitations of single cell or extracellular electrophysiological probing, which only give access to the activity of at best a few neurons simultaneously and to population activity of unresolved cellular origin, respectively. In parallel, optogenetics has demonstrated that targeting neuronal cells with photosensitive microbial opsins, enables the transduction of photons into electrical currents of opposite polarities thus writing, through activation or inhibition, neuronal signals in a non-invasive way. These progresses have in turn stimulated the development of sophisticated optical methods to increase spatial and temporal resolution, light penetration depth and imaging volume. Today, nonlinear microscopy, combined with spatio-temporal wave front shaping, endoscopic probes engineering or multi scan heads design, enable in vivo in depth, simultaneous recording of thousands of cells in mm 3 volumes at single-spike precision and single-cell resolution. Joint progress in opsin engineering, wave front shaping and laser development have provided the methodology, that we named circuits optogenetics, to control single or multiple target activity independently in space and time with single- neuron and single-spike precision, at large depths. Here, we will review the most significant breakthroughs of the past years, which enable reading and writing neuronal activity at the relevant spatiotemporal scale for brain circuits manipulation, with particular emphasis on the most recent advances in circuit optogenetics.

Molecular imaging using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has become a major biomedical imaging technology. Its application towards characterisation of biochemical processes in disease could enable early detection and diagnosis, development of novel therapies and treatment evaluation. The technology is underpinned by the use of imaging probes radiolabelled with short-lived radioisotopes which can be specific and selective for biological targets in vivo e.g. markers for receptors, protein deposits, enzymes and metabolism. My talk will focus on the increasing development and application of PET imaging to clinical research in neurodegenerative diseases, for which it can be applied to delineate and understand the various pathological components of these disorders.

Interoception, the sense of internal bodily signals, is essential for physiological homeostasis, cognition, and emotions. Human neuroimaging studies suggest insular cortex plays a central role in interoception, yet the cellular and circuit mechanisms of its involvement remain unclear. We developed a microprism-based cellular imaging approach to monitor insular cortex activity in behaving mice across different physiological need states. We combine this imaging approach with manipulations of peripheral physiology, circuit-mapping, cell type-specific and circuit-specific manipulation approaches to investigate the underlying circuit mechanisms. I will present our recent data investigating insular cortex activity during two physiological need states – hunger and thirst. These wereinduced naturally by caloric/fluid deficiency, or artificially by activation of specific hypothalamic “hunger neurons” and “thirst neurons”. We found that insular cortex ongoing activity faithfully represents current physiological state, independently of behavior or arousal levels. In contrast, transient responses to learned food- or water-predicting cues reflect a population-level “simulation” of future predicted satiety. Together with additional circuit-mapping and manipulation experiments, our findings suggest that insular cortex integrates visceral-sensory inputs regarding current physiological state with hypothalamus-gated amygdala inputs signaling availability of food/water. This way, insular cortex computes a prediction of future physiological state that can be used to guide behavioral choice.

This webinar is mainly focused on “Biomarkers for Addiction Treatment Development: fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity as an Example”. Biomarkers and Biotypes of Drug Addiction: funding opportunities at NIDA, Tanya Ramey (NIDA, US) Neuroimaging-based Biomarker Development for Clinical Trials, Owen Carmicheal (Pennington Biomedical Research Center, USA) ENIGMA-Addiction Cue Reactivity Initiative (ACRI) and Checklist, Hamed Ekhtiari (Laureate Institute for Brain Research, USA) ENIGMA-ACRI Checklist: Participant Characteristics, General fMRI Information, General Task Information, Cue Information, Task-related Assessments, Pre-Post Scanning Consideration (James Prisciandaro, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Marc Kaufman, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, USA; Anna Zilverstand, University of Minnesota; Torsten Wüstenberg, Charité Medical University Berlin, Germany; Falk Kiefer, University of Heidelberg, Germany; Amy Janes, Harvard Medical School, USA) How to Add fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity to the ENIGMA Consortium: Road Ahead, Hugh Garavan, University of Vermont)

The neurotransmitter dopamine is essential for normal reward learning and motivational arousal processes. Indeed these core functions are implicated in the major neurological and psychiatric dopamine disorders such as schizophrenia, substance abuse disorders/addiction and Parkinson's disease. Over the years, we have made significant strides in understanding the dopamine system across multiple levels of description, and I will focus on our recent advances in the computational description, and brain circuit mechanisms that facilitate the dual role of dopamine in learning and performance. I will specifically describe our recent work with imaging the activity of dopamine axons and measurements of dopamine release in mice performing various behavioural tasks. We discovered wave-like spatiotemporal activity of dopamine in the striatal region, and I will argue that this pattern of activation supports a critical computational operation; spatiotemporal credit assignment to regional striatal subexperts. Our findings provide a mechanistic description for vectorizing reward prediction error signals relayed by dopamine.

To enable the understanding and repair of complex biological systems, such as the brain, we are creating novel optical tools that enable molecular-resolution maps of such systems, as well as technologies for observing and controlling high-speed physiological dynamics in such systems. First, we have developed a method for imaging specimens with nanoscale precision, by embedding them in a swellable polymer, homogenizing their mechanical properties, and exposing them to water – which causes them to expand manyfold isotropically. This method, which we call expansion microscopy (ExM), enables ordinary microscopes to do nanoscale imaging, in a multiplexed fashion – important, for example, for brain mapping. Second, we have developed a set of genetically-encoded reagents, known as optogenetic tools, that when expressed in specific neurons, enable their electrical activities to be precisely driven or silenced in response to millisecond timescale pulses of light. Finally, we are designing, and evolving, novel reagents, such as fluorescent voltage indicators and somatically targeted calcium indicators, to enable the imaging of fast physiological processes in 3-D with millisecond precision. In this way we aim to enable the systematic mapping, control, and dynamical observation of complex biological systems like the brain. The talk will be simultaneously interpreted English-Spanish) by the Interpreter, Mg. Lourdes Martino. Para permitir la comprensión y reparación de sistemas biológicos complejos, como el cerebro, estamos creando herramientas ópticas novedosas que permiten crear mapas de resolución molecular de dichos sistemas, así como tecnologías para observar y controlar la dinámica fisiológica de alta velocidad en dichos sistemas. Primero, hemos desarrollado un método para obtener imágenes de muestras con precisión a nanoescala, incrustándolas en un polímero hinchable, homogeneizando sus propiedades mecánicas y exponiéndolas al agua, lo que hace que se expandan muchas veces isotrópicamente. Este método, que llamamos microscopía de expansión (ExM), permite que los microscopios ordinarios obtengan imágenes a nanoescala, de forma multiplexada, lo que es importante, por ejemplo, para el mapeo cerebral. En segundo lugar, hemos desarrollado un conjunto de reactivos codificados genéticamente, conocidos como herramientas optogenéticas, que cuando se expresan en neuronas específicas, permiten que sus actividades eléctricas sean activadas o silenciadas con precisión en respuesta a pulsos de luz en una escala de tiempo de milisegundos. Finalmente, estamos diseñando y desarrollando reactivos novedosos, como indicadores de voltaje fluorescentes e indicadores de calcio dirigidos somáticamente, para permitir la obtención de imágenes de procesos fisiológicos rápidos en 3-D con precisión de milisegundos. De esta manera, nuestro objetivo es permitir el mapeo sistemático, el control y la observación dinámica de sistemas biológicos complejos como el cerebro. La conferencia será traducida simultáneamente al español por la intérprete Mg. Lourdes Martino.

The brain is remarkably flexible, and appears to instantly reconfigure its processing depending on what’s needed to solve a task at hand: fMRI studies indicate that distal brain areas appear to fluidly couple and decouple with one another depending on behavioral context. We investigated how the brain coordinates its activity across areas to inform complex, top-down control behaviors. Animals were trained to perform a novel brain machine interface task to guide a visual cursor to a reward zone, using activity recorded with widefield calcium imaging. This allowed us to screen for cortical areas implicated in causal neural control of the visual object. Animals could decorrelate normally highly-correlated areas to perform the task, and used an explore-exploit search in neural activity space to discover successful strategies. Higher visual and parietal areas were more active during the task in expert animals. Single unit recordings targeted to these areas indicated that the sensory representation of an object was sensitive to an animal’s subjective sense of controlling it.

Esta conferencia pretende ofrecer una visión panorámica de los progresos en el conocimiento del cerebro, desde la fundación por Cajal de la moderna neurociencia hasta los muy recientes hallazgos aportados por la genética, la biología molecular, la microscopia y la electrofisiología al conocimiento de la estructura, conectividad y función de las células nerviosas, asi como sobre el funcionamiento integrado del cerebro humano aportado por las nuevas técnicas de imagen y el registro y estimulación selectivos de las distintas áreas cerebrales y su análisis con técnicas de computación. Finalmente se discutirán las repercusiones médicas y sociales que implica un mejor conocimiento del cerebro, sus limitaciones en el momento actual y los riesgo que conlleva el mal uso de los avances científicos de la neurociencia.

How does a circuit of neurons process sensory information? And how are transformations of neural signals altered by changes in synaptic strength? We investigate these questions in the context of the visual system and the lateral line of fish. A distinguishing feature of our approach is the imaging of activity across populations of synapses – the fundamental elements of signal transfer within all brain circuits. A guiding hypothesis is that the plasticity of neurotransmission plays a major part in controlling the input-output relation of sensory circuits, regulating the tuning and sensitivity of neurons to allow adaptation or sensitization to particular features of the input. Sensory systems continuously adjust their input-output relation according to the recent history of the stimulus. A common alteration is a decrease in the gain of the response to a constant feature of the input, termed adaptation. For instance, in the retina, many of the ganglion cells (RGCs) providing the output produce their strongest responses just after the temporal contrast of the stimulus increases, but the response declines if this input is maintained. The advantage of adaptation is that it prevents saturation of the response to strong stimuli and allows for continued signaling of future increases in stimulus strength. But adaptation comes at a cost: a reduced sensitivity to a future decrease in stimulus strength. The retina compensates for this loss of information through an intriguing strategy: while some RGCs adapt following a strong stimulus, a second population gradually becomes sensitized. We found that the underlying circuit mechanisms involve two opposing forms of synaptic plasticity in bipolar cells: synaptic depression causes adaptation and facilitation causes sensitization. Facilitation is in turn caused by depression in inhibitory synapses providing negative feedback. These opposing forms of plasticity can cause simultaneous increases and decreases in contrast-sensitivity of different RGCs, which suggests a general framework for understanding the function of sensory circuits: plasticity of both excitatory and inhibitory synapses control dynamic changes in tuning and gain.

Drug addiction is a chronically relapsing disorder characterized by compulsive drug use despite catastrophic personal consequences (e.g., loss of family, job) and even when the substance is no longer perceived as pleasurable. In this talk, I will present results of human neuroimaging studies, utilizing a multimodal approach (neuropsychology, functional magnetic resonance imaging, event-related potentials recordings), to explore the neurobiology underlying the core psychological impairments in drug addiction (impulsivity, drive/motivation, insight/awareness) as associated with its clinical symptomatology (intoxication, craving, bingeing, withdrawal). The focus of this talk is on understanding the role of the dopaminergic mesocorticolimbic circuit, and especially the prefrontal cortex, in higher-order executive dysfunction (e.g., disadvantageous decision-making such as trading a car for a couple of cocaine hits) in drug addicted individuals. The theoretical model that guides the presented research is called iRISA (Impaired Response Inhibition and Salience Attribution), postulating that abnormalities in the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, as related to dopaminergic dysfunction, contribute to the core clinical symptoms in drug addiction. Specifically, our multi-modality program of research is guided by the underlying working hypothesis that drug addicted individuals disproportionately attribute reward value to their drug of choice at the expense of other potentially but no-longer-rewarding stimuli, with a concomitant decrease in the ability to inhibit maladaptive drug use. In this talk I will also explore whether treatment (as usual) and 6-month abstinence enhance recovery in these brain-behavior compromises in treatment seeking cocaine addicted individuals. Promising neuroimaging studies, which combine pharmacological (i.e., oral methylphenidate, or RitalinTM) and salient cognitive tasks or functional connectivity during resting-state, will be discussed as examples for using neuroimaging for empirically guiding the development of effective neurorehabilitation strategies (encompassing cognitive reappraisal and transcranial direct current stimulation) in drug addiction.

Humans continuously need to learn to make good choices – be it using a new video-conferencing set up, figuring out what questions to ask to successfully secure a reliable babysitter, or just selecting which location in a house is least likely to be interrupted by toddlers during work calls. However, the goals we seek to attain – such as using zoom successfully – are often vaguely defined and previously unexperienced, and in that sense cannot be known by us as being rewarding. We hypothesized that learning to make good choices in such situations nevertheless leverages reinforcement learning processes, and that executive functions in general, and working memory in particular, play a crucial role in defining the reward function for arbitrary outcomes in such a way that they become reinforcing. I will show results from a novel behavioral protocol, as well as preliminary computational and imaging evidence supporting our hypothesis.

Tractography datasets, calculated from dMRI, represent the main WM structural connections in the brain. Thanks to advances in image acquisition and processing, the complexity and size of these datasets have constantly increased, also containing a large amount of artifacts. We present some examples of algorithms, most of them based on classical machine learning approaches, to analyze these data and identify common connectivity patterns among subjects.

In many ways, cognitive neuroscience is the attempt to use physiological observation to clarify the mechanisms that shape behavior. Over the past 25 years, fMRI has provided a system-wide and yet somewhat spatially precise view of the response in human cortex evoked by a wide variety of stimuli and task contexts. The current talk focuses on the other direction of inference; the implications of this observed functional organization for behavior. To begin, we must interrogate the methodological and empirical frameworks underlying our derivation of this organization, partially by exploring its relationship to and predictability from gross neuroanatomy. Next, across a series of studies, the implications of two properties of functional organization for behavior will be explored: 1) the co-localization of visual working memory and perceptual processing and 2) implicit learning in the context of distributed responses. In sum, these results highlight the limitations of our current approach and hint at a new general mechanism for explaining observed behavior in context with the neural substrate.

Temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with memory deficits but the circuit mechanisms underlying these cognitive disabilities are not understood. We used electrophysiological recordings, open-source wire-free miniaturized microscopy and computational modeling to probe these deficits in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. We find desynchronization of dentate gyrus interneurons with CA1 interneurons during theta oscillations and a loss of precision and stability of place fields. We also find that emergence of place cell dysfunction is delayed, providing a potential temporal window for treatments. Computation modeling shows that desynchronization rather than interneuron cell loss can drive place cell dysfunction. Future studies will uncover cell types driving these changes and transcriptional changes that may be driving dysfunction.

People frequently interpret the same information differently, based on their prior beliefs and views. This may occur in everyday settings, as when two friends are watching the same movie, but also in more consequential circumstances, such as when people interpret the same news differently based on their political views. The role of subjective knowledge in altering how the brain processes narratives has been explored mainly in controlled settings. I will present two projects that examines neural mechanisms underlying narrative interpretation “in the wild” -- how responses differ between two groups of people who interpret the same narrative in two coherent, but opposing ways. In the first project we manipulated participant’s prior knowledge to make them interpret the narrative differently, and found that responses in high-order areas, including the default mode network, language areas and subsets of the mirror neuron system, tend to be similar among people who share the same interpretation, but different from people with an opposing interpretation. In contrast to the active manipulation of participants’ interpretation in the first study, in the second (ongoing) project we examine these processes in a more ecological setting. Taking advantage of people’s natural tendencies to interpret the world through their own (political) filters, we examine these mechanisms while measuring their brain response to political movie clips. These studies are intended to deepen our understanding of the differences in subjective construal processes, by mapping their underlying brain mechanisms.

Over the past decade, the domain of face identity processing has seen a surging interest in inter-individual differences, with a focus on individuals with superior skills, so-called Super-Recognizers (SRs; Ramon et al., 2019; Russell et al., 2009). Their study can provide valuable insights into brain-behavior relationships and advance our understanding of neural functioning. Despite a decade of research, and similarly to the field of developmental prosopagnosia, a consensus on diagnostic criteria for SR identification is lacking. Consequently, SRs are currently identified either inconsistently, via suboptimal individual tests, or via undocumented collections of tests. This state of the field has two major implications. Firstly, our scientific understanding of SRs will remain at best limited. Secondly, the needs of government agencies interested in deploying SRs for real-life identity verification (e.g., policing) are unlikely to be met. To counteract these issues, I suggest the following action points. Firstly, based on our and others’ work suggesting novel and challenging tests of face cognition (Bobak et al., 2019; Fysh et al., in press; Stacchi et al., 2019), and my collaborations with international security agencies, I recommend novel diagnostic criteria for SR identification. These are currently being used to screen the Berlin State Police’s >25K employees before identifying SRs via bespoke testing procedures we have collaboratively developed over the past years. Secondly, I introduce a cohort of SRs identified using these criteria, which is being studied in-depth using behavioral methods, psychophysics, eye-tracking, and neuroimaging. Finally, I suggest data acquired for these individuals should be curated to develop and share best practices with researchers and practitioners, and to gain an accurate and transparent description of SR cases to exploit their informative value.

I will present work on a novel fMRI analysis method that allows us to investigate sequential reactivation in the hippocampus. Our method focuses on analysing the time courses of probabilistic multivariate classifiers and allows us to infer the presence and frequency of fast sequential reactivation events. Using a paradigm in which we controlled the speed of sequential visually elicited activations, we validated the method in visual cortex for event sequences with only 32 ms between items. We show that detectability remains possible if low signal-to-noise ratio and when sequence events occur at unknown times. In a preliminary analysis, we show that even the exposure to our visual paradigm elicits reactivations in visual cortex at rest following the task. I then present work in which we tested how representations influence replay by asking whether transitions between task-state representations are reactivated at rest during hippocampal replay events. Participants learned to make decisions about ambiguous stimuli that depended on past events and attentionally filtered stimulus processing. FMRI signals during rest periods following this task indicated sequential reactivation of task states. These results indicate that adaptive task state representations are computed and replayed at different cortical sites. In combination with other methods, fMRI may allow us to unravel this coordinated nature of replay.

Understanding and remembering realistic experiences in our everyday lives requires activating many kinds of structured knowledge about the world, including spatial maps, temporal event scripts, and semantic relationships. My recent projects have explored the ways in which we build up this schematic knowledge (during a single experiment and across developmental timescales) and can strategically deploy them to construct event representations that we can store in memory or use to make predictions. I will describe my lab's ongoing work developing new experimental and analysis techniques for conducting functional MRI experiments using narratives, movies, poetry, virtual reality, and "memory experts" to study complex naturalistic schemas.

Information that is shared across brains is encoded in idiosyncratic fine-scale functional topographies. Hyperalignment jointly models shared information and idiosyncratic topographies. Pattern vectors for neural responses and connectivities are projected into a common, high-dimensional information space, rather than being aligned in a canonical anatomical space. Hyperalignment calculates individual transformation matrices that preserve the geometry of pairwise dissimilarities between pattern vectors. Individual cortical topographies are modeled as mixtures of overlapping, individual-specific topographic basis functions, rather than as contiguous functional areas. The fundamental property of brain function that is preserved across brains is information content, rather than the functional properties of local features that support that content.

behaviour varies even among genetically identical animals raised in the same environment. However, little is known about the circuit or anatomical underpinnings of this individuality, though previous work implicates sensory periphery. Drosophila olfaction presents an ideal model to study the biological basis of behavioural individuality, because while the neural circuit underlying olfactory behaviour is well-described and highly stereotyped, persistent idiosyncrasy in behaviour, neural coding, and neural wiring have also been described. Projection neurons (PNs), which relay odor signals sensed by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to deeper brain structures, exhibit variable calcium responses to identical odor stimuli across individuals, but how these idiosyncrasies relate to individual behavioural responses remains unknown. Here, using paired behaviour and two-photon imaging measurements, we show that idiosyncratic calcium dynamics in both ORNs and PNs predict individual preferences for an aversive monomolecular odorant versus air, suggesting that variation at the periphery of the olfactory system determines individual preference for an odor’s presence. In contrast, PN, but not ORN, calcium responses predict individual preferences in a two-odor choice assay. Furthermore, paired behaviour and immunohistochemistry measurements reveal that variation in ORN presynaptic density also predicts two-odor preference, suggesting this site is a locus of individuality where microscale circuit variation gives rise to idiosyncrasy in behaviour. Our results demonstrate how a neural circuit may vary functionally and structurally to produce variable behaviour among individuals.