Neuroscience seminars
January 2021
Developmental regulation of H3K27me3 drives synapse maturation and social behavior
Urann Chan· Duke
Wed, Jan 13 · 08:30 UTC
Human neuronal activity-dependent gene regulation in development and disease
Gabriella Boulting· Harvard Medical School
Wed, Jan 13 · 08:00 UTC
Individual neurons in visual cortex provide the brain with unreliable estimates of visual features. It is not known if the single-neuron variability is correlated across large neural populations, thus impairing the global encoding of stimuli. We recorded simultaneously from up to 50,000 neurons in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) and in higher-order visual areas and measured stimulus discrimination thresholds of 0.35 degrees and 0.37 degrees respectively in an orientation decoding task. These neural thresholds were almost 100 times smaller than the behavioral discrimination thresholds reported in mice. This discrepancy could not be explained by stimulus properties or arousal states. Furthermore, the behavioral variability during a sensory discrimination task could not be explained by neural variability in primary visual cortex. Instead behavior-related neural activity arose dynamically across a network of non-sensory brain areas. These results imply that sensory perception in mice is limited by downstream decoders, not by neural noise in sensory representations.
Learning from learning in recurrent neural networks
Omri Barak· Technion, Haifa
Wed, Jan 6 · 16:00 UTC
Learning a new skill requires assimilating into our brain the regularities of the external world and how our body interacts with them as we engage in this skill. Trained Recurrent Neural Networks (TRNNs) are increasingly used as models of neural circuits of animals that were trained in laboratory setups, but the learning process itself has received less attention. Furthermore, most use of TRNNs is of a heuristic, rather than theory-based, nature, leaving many open questions: Which tasks yield to this approach and why? How do initial network architecture and learning rules bias the resultant network? In this talk, I will argue that studying the learning process of TRNNs can both advance our understanding of TRNNs and set up possible comparisons to the biological process of learning. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2021-01-06. Recording duration: 00:42:41.
Computational NeuroscienceMachine LearningSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience SeminarVideo+1 more
Slowly ramping dopaminergic activity controls the moment-to-moment decision of when to move
Allison Hamilos· Harvard
Wed, Jan 6 · 08:30 UTC
A circuit for coordination of learned and innate courtship behaviors
Mor Ben-Tov· Duke
Wed, Jan 6 · 08:00 UTC
Surprising generalizations in the neural implementation of Hebrew and English word reading
Michal Ben Shachar· Bar Ilan University
Tue, Jan 5 · 13:00 UTC
December 2020
Linking dimensionality to computation in neural networks
Stefano Recanatesi· University of Washington
Wed, Dec 23 · 05:00 UTC
The link between behavior, learning and the underlying connectome is a fundamental open problem in neuroscience. In my talk I will show how it is possible to develop a theory that bridges across these three levels (animal behavior, learning and network connectivity) based on the geometrical properties of neural activity. The central tool in my approach is the dimensionality of neural activity. I will link animal complex behavior to the geometry of neural representations, specifically their dimensionality; I will then show how learning shapes changes in such geometrical properties and how local connectivity properties can further regulate them. As a result, I will explain how the complexity of neural representations emerges from both behavioral demands (top-down approach) and learning or connectivity features (bottom-up approach). I will build these results regarding neural dynamics and representations starting from the analysis of neural recordings, by means of theoretical and computational tools that blend dynamical systems, artificial intelligence and statistical physics approaches.
Conscious access on the left in right parietal stroke
Nachum Soroker· Tel Aviv University and Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital
Tue, Dec 22 · 13:00 UTC
Ways to think about the brain
Gyorgy Buzsaki· NYU Neuroscience Institute, Langone Medical Center
Thu, Dec 17 · 11:00 UTC
Historically, research on the brain has been working its way in from the outside world, hoping that such systematic exploration will take us some day to the middle and on through the middle to the output. Ever since the time of Aristotle, philosophers and scientists have assumed that the brain (or, more precisely, the mind) is initially a blank slate filled up gradually with experience in an outside-in manner. An alternative, brain-centric view, the one I am promoting, is that self-organized brain networks induce a vast repertoire of preformed neuronal patterns. While interacting with the world, some of these initially ‘nonsensical’ patterns acquire behavioral significance or meaning. Thus, experience is primarily a process of matching preexisting neuronal dynamics to events in the world. I suggest that perpetually active, internal dynamic is the source of cognition, a neuronal operation disengaged from immediate senses.
In-Love with Addiction Neuroscience
Antonio Verdejo-García· Monash Univesity, Australia
Thu, Dec 17 · 09:00 UTC
In this talk series, addiction neuroscientists from across the world share their personal stories/experiences on the beauty of addiction neuroscience and how/why they have decided to invest their scientific life in this field. We hope that this talk series would encourage and support a new generation of young and passionate addiction neuroscientists in different countries to revolutionize the field of addiction medicine.
How does the cortex integrate conflicting time-information? A model of temporal averaging
Benjamin De Corte· University of Iowa, USA
Thu, Dec 17 · 04:00 UTC
In daily life, we consistently make decisions in pursuit of some goal. Many decisions are informed by multiple sources of information. Unfortunately, these sources often provide ambiguous information about what course of action to take. Therefore, determining how the brain integrates information to resolve this ambiguity is key to understanding the neural mechanisms of decision-making. In the domain of time, this topic can be studied by training subjects to predict when a future event will occur based on distinct cues (e.g., tone, light, etc.). If multiple cues are presented simultaneously and their cue-to-event intervals differ (e.g., tone-10s + light-30s), subjects will often expect the event to occur at the average of their intervals. This ‘temporal averaging’ effect is presumably how the timing system resolves ambiguous time-information. The neural mechanisms of temporal averaging are currently unclear. Here, we will propose how temporal averaging could emerge in cortical circuits using a simple modification of a ‘drift-diffusion’ model of timing.
Retrieval spikes: a dendritic mechanism for retrieval-dependent memory consolidation
Erez Geron· NYU
Wed, Dec 16 · 08:30 UTC
Human TREM2 knockout microglia fail to activate towards Alzheimer’s disease pathology
Amanda McQuade· UC Irvine
Wed, Dec 16 · 08:00 UTC
Neural Mechanisms of Coordination in Duetting Wrens
Melissa Coleman· Claremont McKenna
Wed, Dec 16 · 06:00 UTC
To communicate effectively, two individuals must take turns to prevent overlap in their signals. How does the nervous system coordinate vocalizations between two individuals? Female and male plain-tailed wrens sing a duet in which they alternate syllable production so rapidly and precisely it sounds as if a single bird is singing. I will talk about experiments that examine the interaction between sensory cues and motor activity, using behavioral manipulations and neurophysiological recordings from pairs of awake, duetting wrens. I will show evidence that auditory cues link the brains of the wrens by modulating motor circuits.
Correlations, chaos, and criticality in neural networks
Moritz Helias· Juelich Research Center
Wed, Dec 16 · 05:00 UTC
The remarkable properties of information-processing of biological and of artificial neuronal networks alike arise from the interaction of large numbers of neurons. A central quest is thus to characterize their collective states. The directed coupling between pairs of neurons and their continuous dissipation of energy, moreover, cause dynamics of neuronal networks outside thermodynamic equilibrium. Tools from non-equilibrium statistical mechanics and field theory are thus instrumental to obtain a quantitative understanding. We here present progress with this recent approach [1]. On the experimental side, we show how correlations between pairs of neurons are informative on the dynamics of cortical networks: they are poised near a transition to chaos [2]. Close to this transition, we find prolongued sequential memory for past signals [3]. In the chaotic regime, networks offer representations of information whose dimensionality expands with time. We show how this mechanism aids classification performance [4]. Together these works illustrate the fruitful interplay between theoretical physics, neuronal networks, and neural information processing.
Learning-induced changes in visual cortical processing
Wu Li· Beijing Normal University
Tue, Dec 15 · 13:00 UTC
Targeting the synapse in Alzheimer’s Disease
Johanna Jackson· UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London
Mon, Dec 14 · 11:00 UTC
Alzheimer’s Disease is characterised by the accumulation of misfolded proteins, namely amyloid and tau, however it is synapse loss which leads to the cognitive impairments associated with the disease. Many studies have focussed on single time points to determine the effects of pathology on synapses however this does not inform on the plasticity of the synapses, that is how they behave in vivo as the pathology progresses. Here we used in vivo two-photon microscopy to assess the temporal dynamics of axonal boutons and dendritic spines in mouse models of tauopathy[1] (rTg4510) and amyloidopathy[2] (J20). This revealed that pre- and post-synaptic components are differentially affected in both AD models in response to pathology. In the Tg4510 model, differences in the stability and turnover of axonal boutons and dendritic spines immediately prior to neurite degeneration was revealed. Moreover, the dystrophic neurites could be partially rescued by transgene suppression. Understanding the imbalance in the response of pre- and post-synaptic components is crucial for drug discovery studies targeting the synapse in Alzheimer’s Disease. To investigate how sub-types of synapses are affected in human tissue, the Multi-‘omics Atlas Project, a UKDRI initiative to comprehensively map the pathology in human AD, will determine the synaptome changes using imaging and synaptic proteomics in human post mortem AD tissue. The use of multiple brain regions and multiple stages of disease will enable a pseudotemporal profile of pathology and the associated synapse alterations to be determined. These data will be compared to data from preclinical models to determine the functional implications of the human findings, to better inform preclinical drug discovery studies and to develop a therapeutic strategy to target synapses in Alzheimer’s Disease[3].
What about antibiotics for the treatment of the dyskinesia induced by L-DOPA?
Elaine Del-Bel· Professor of Physiology,Department of Morphology, Physiology and Basic Pathology, School of Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto (FORP), University of São Paulo.
Mon, Dec 14 · 06:00 UTC
L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia is a debilitating adverse effect of treating Parkinson’s disease with this drug. New therapeutic approaches that prevent or attenuate this side effect is clearly needed. Wistar adult male rats submitted to 6-hydroxydopamine-induced unilateral medial forebrain bundle lesions were treated with L-DOPA (oral or subcutaneous, 20 mg kg-1) once a day for 14 days. After this period, we tested if doxycycline (40 mg kg-1, intraperitoneal, a subantimicrobial dose) and COL-3 (50 and 100 nmol, intracerebroventricular) could reverse LID. In an additional experiment, doxycycline was also administered repeatedly with L-DOPA to verify if it would prevent LID development. A single injection of doxycycline or COL-3 together with L-DOPA attenuated the dyskinesia. Co-treatment with doxycycline from the first day of L-DOPA suppressed the onset of dyskinesia. The improved motor responses to L-DOPA remained intact in the presence of doxycycline or COL-3, indicating the preservation of L-DOPA-produced benefits. Doxycycline treatment was associated with decreased immunoreactivity of FosB, cyclooxygenase-2, the astroglial protein GFAP and the microglial protein OX-42 which are elevated in the basal ganglia of rats exhibiting dyskinesia. Doxycycline also decreased metalloproteinase-2/-9 activity, metalloproteinase-3 expression and reactive oxygen species production. Metalloproteinase-2/-9 activity and production of reactive oxygen species in the basal ganglia of dyskinetic rats showed a significant correlation with the intensity of dyskinesia. The present study demonstrates the anti-dyskinetic potential of doxycycline and its analog compound COL-3 in hemiparkinsonian rats. Given the long-established and safe clinical use of doxycycline, this study suggests that these drugs might be tested to reduce or to prevent L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s patients.