Optogenetics seminars

Recent advances in optogenetics allow for stimulation of neurons with sub-millisecond spike jitter and single neuron selectivity. Already this precision has revealed new levels of cortical sensitivity: stimulating tens of neurons can yield changes in the mean firing rate of thousands of similarly tuned neurons. This extreme sensitivity suggests that cortical dynamics are near criticality. Criticality is often studied in neural systems as a non-equilibrium thermodynamic process in which scale-free patterns of activity, called avalanches, emerge between distinct states of spontaneous activity. While criticality is well studied, it is still unclear what these distinct states of spontaneous activity are and what responses we expect from stimulation of this activity. By answering these questions, optogenetic stimulation will become a new avenue for approaching criticality and understanding cortical dynamics. Here, for the first time, we study the effects of optogenetic-like stimulation on a model near criticality. We study a model of Inhibitory/Excitatory (I/E) Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) spiking neurons which display a region of high sensitivity as seen in experiments. We find that this region of sensitivity is, indeed, near criticality. We derive the Dynamic Mean Field Theory of this model and find that the distinct states of activity are asynchrony and synchrony. We use our theory to characterize response to various types and strengths of optogenetic stimulation. Our model and theory predict that asynchronous, near-critical dynamics can have two qualitatively different responses to stimulation: one characterized by high sensitivity, discrete event responses, and high trial-to-trial variability, and another characterized by low sensitivity, continuous responses with characteristic frequencies, and low trial-to-trial variability. While both response types may be considered near-critical in model space, networks which are closest to criticality show a hybrid of these response effects.

Inter-areal coherence between cortical field-potentials is a widespread phenomenon and depends on numerous behavioral and cognitive factors. It has been hypothesized that inter-areal coherence reflects phase-synchronization between local oscillations and flexibly gates communication. We reveal an alternative mechanism, where coherence results from and is not the cause of communication, and naturally emerges as a consequence of the fact that spiking activity in a sending area causes post-synaptic inputs both in the same area and in other areas. Consequently, coherence depends in a lawful manner on oscillatory power and phase-locking in a sending area and inter-areal connectivity. We show that changes in oscillatory power explain prominent changes in fronto-parietal beta-coherence with movement and memory, and LGN-V1 gamma-coherence with arousal and visual stimulation. Optogenetic silencing of a receiving area and E/I network simulations demonstrate that afferent synaptic inputs rather than spiking entrainment are the main determinant of inter-areal coherence. These findings suggest that the unique spectral profiles of different brain areas automatically give rise to large-scale inter-areal coherence patterns that follow anatomical connectivity and continuously reconfigure as a function of behavior and cognition.

Ever since Bliss and Lømo discovered the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) in rabbit dentate gyrus in the 1960s, Hebb’s rule—neurons that fire together wire together—gained popularity to explain learning and memory. Accumulating evidence, however, suggests that neural activity is homeostatically regulated. Homeostatic mechanisms are mostly interpreted to stabilize network dynamics. However, recent theoretical work has shown that linking the activity of a neuron to its connectivity within the network provides a robust alternative implementation of Hebb’s rule, although entirely based on negative feedback. In this setting, both natural and artificial stimulation of neurons can robustly trigger network rewiring. We used computational models of plastic networks to simulate the complex temporal dynamics of network rewiring in response to external stimuli. In parallel, we performed optogenetic stimulation experiments in the mouse anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and subsequently analyzed the temporal profile of morphological changes in the stimulated tissue. Our results suggest that the new theoretical framework combining neural activity homeostasis and structural plasticity provides a consistent explanation of our experimental observations.

In our everyday lives, we form connections and build up social networks that allow us to function successfully as individuals and as a society. Our social networks tend to include well-connected individuals who link us to other groups of people that we might otherwise have limited access to. In addition, we are more likely to befriend individuals who a) live nearby and b) have mutual friends. Interestingly, neurons tend to do the same…until development is perturbed. Just like social networks, neuronal networks require highly connected hubs to elicit efficient communication at minimal cost (you can’t befriend everybody you meet, nor can every neuron wire with every other!). This talk will cover some of Alex’s work showing that microscopic (cellular scale) brain networks inferred from spontaneous activity show similar complex topology to that previously described in macroscopic human brain scans. The talk will also discuss what happens when neurodevelopment is disrupted in the case of a monogenic disorder called Rett Syndrome. This will include simulations of neuronal activity and the effects of manipulation of model parameters as well as what happens when we manipulate real developing networks using optogenetics. If functional development can be restored in atypical networks, this may have implications for treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders like Rett Syndrome.

The ability to reach, grasp, and manipulate objects is a remarkable expression of motor skill, and the loss of this ability in injury, stroke, or disease can be devastating. These behaviors are controlled by the coordinated activity of tens of millions of neurons distributed across many CNS regions, including the primary motor cortex. While many studies have characterized the activity of single cortical neurons during reaching, the principles governing the dynamics of large, distributed neural populations remain largely unknown. Recent work in primates has suggested that during the execution of reaching, motor cortex may autonomously generate the neural pattern controlling the movement, much like the spinal central pattern generator for locomotion. In this seminar, I will describe recent work that tests this hypothesis using large-scale neural recording, high-resolution behavioral measurements, dynamical systems approaches to data analysis, and optogenetic perturbations in mice. We find, by contrast, that motor cortex requires strong, continuous, and time-varying thalamic input to generate the neural pattern driving reaching. In a second line of work, we demonstrate that the cortico-cerebellar loop is not critical for driving the arm towards the target, but instead fine-tunes movement parameters to enable precise and accurate behavior. Finally, I will describe my future plans to apply these experimental and analytical approaches to the adaptive control of locomotion in complex environments.

The Miniscope Project -- an open-source collaborative effort—was created to accelerate innovation of miniature microscope technology and to increase global access to this technology. Currently, we are working on advancements ranging from optogenetic stimulation and wire-free operation to simultaneous optical and electrophysiological recording. Using these systems, we have uncovered mechanisms underlying temporal memory linking and investigated causes of cognitive deficits in temporal lobe epilepsy. Through innovation and optimization, this work aims to extend the reach of neuroscience research and create new avenues of scientific inquiry.

Tracking heading within an environment is a fundamental requirement for flexible, goal-directed navigation. In insects, a head-direction representation that guides the animal’s movements is maintained in a conserved brain region called the central complex. Two-photon calcium imaging of genetically targeted neural populations in the central complex of tethered fruit flies behaving in virtual reality (VR) environments has shown that the head-direction representation is updated based on self-motion cues and external sensory information, such as visual features and wind direction. Thus far, the head direction representation has mainly been studied in VR settings that only give flies control of the angular rotation of simple sensory cues. How the fly’s head direction circuitry enables the animal to navigate in dynamic, immersive and naturalistic environments is largely unexplored. I have developed a novel setup that permits imaging in complex VR environments that also accommodate flies’ translational movements. I have previously demonstrated that flies perform visually-guided navigation in such an immersive VR setting, and also that they learn to associate aversive optogenetically-generated heat stimuli with specific visual landmarks. A stable head direction representation is likely necessary to support such behaviors, but the underlying neural mechanisms are unclear. Based on a connectomic analysis of the central complex, I identified likely circuit mechanisms for prioritizing and combining different sensory cues to generate a stable head direction representation in complex, multimodal environments. I am now testing these predictions using calcium imaging in genetically targeted cell types in flies performing 2D navigation in immersive VR.

Join us for a comprehensive introduction to multielectrode recording technologies for in vivo neurophysiology. Whether you are new to the field or have experience with one type of technology, this webinar will provide you with information about a variety of technologies, with a main focus on Neuropixels probes. Dr Kris Schoepfer, US Product Specialist at Scientifica, will provide an overview of multielectrode technologies available to record from one or more brain areas simultaneously, including: DIY multielectrode probes; Tetrodes / Hyperdrives; Silicon probes; Neuropixels. Dr Sylvia Schröder, University of Sussex, will delve deeper into the advantages of Neuropixels, highlighting the value of channel depth and the types of new biological insights that can be explored thanks to the advancements this technology brings. Presenting exciting data from the optic tract and superior colliculus, Sylvia will also discuss how Neuropixels recordings can be combined with optogenetics, and how histology can be used to identify the location of probes.

Motivational drives are internal states that can be different even in similar interactions with external stimuli. Curiosity as the motivational drive for novelty-seeking and investigating the surrounding environment is for survival as essential and intrinsic as hunger. Curiosity, hunger, and appetitive aggression drive three different goal-directed behaviors—novelty seeking, food eating, and hunting— but these behaviors are composed of similar actions in animals. This similarity of actions has made it challenging to study novelty seeking and distinguish it from eating and hunting in nonarticulating animals. The brain mechanisms underlying this basic survival drive, curiosity, and novelty-seeking behavior have remained unclear. In spite of having well-developed techniques to study mouse brain circuits, there are many controversial and different results in the field of motivational behavior. This has left the functions of motivational brain regions such as the zona incerta (ZI) still uncertain. Not having a transparent, nonreinforced, and easily replicable paradigm is one of the main causes of this uncertainty. Therefore, we chose a simple solution to conduct our research: giving the mouse freedom to choose what it wants—double freeaccess choice. By examining mice in an experimental battery of object free-access double-choice (FADC) and social interaction tests—using optogenetics, chemogenetics, calcium fiber photometry, multichannel recording electrophysiology, and multicolor mRNA in situ hybridization—we uncovered a cell type–specific cortico-subcortical brain circuit of the curiosity and novelty-seeking behavior. We found in mice that inhibitory neurons in the medial ZI (ZIm) are essential for the decision to investigate an object or a conspecific. These neurons receive excitatory input from the prelimbic cortex to signal the initiation of exploration. This signal is modulated in the ZIm by the level of investigatory motivation. Increased activity in the ZIm instigates deep investigative action by inhibiting the periaqueductal gray region. A subpopulation of inhibitory ZIm neurons expressing tachykinin 1 (TAC1) modulates the investigatory behavior.

Coping with threatening situations requires both identifying stimuli predicting danger and selecting adaptive behavioral responses in order to survive. The dorso medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) is a critical structure involved in the regulation of threat-related behaviour, yet it is still largely unclear how threat-predicting stimuli and defensive behaviours are associated within prefrontal networks in order to successfully drive adaptive responses. To address these questions, we used a combination of extracellular recordings, neuronal decoding approaches, and optogenetic manipulations to show that threat representations and the initiation of avoidance behaviour are dynamically encoded in the overall population activity of dmPFC neurons. These data indicate that although dmPFC population activity at stimulus onset encodes sustained threat representations and discriminates threat- from non-threat cues, it does not predict action outcome. In contrast, transient dmPFC population activity prior to action initiation reliably predicts avoided from non-avoided trials. Accordingly, optogenetic inhibition of prefrontal activity critically constrained the selection of adaptive defensive responses in a time-dependent manner. These results reveal that the adaptive selection of active fear responses relies on a dynamic process of information linking threats with defensive actions unfolding within prefrontal networks.

Transient changes in dopamine activity in response to reward and punishment have been known to regulate reward-related learning. However, the cellular basis that detects the transient dopamine signaling has long been unclear. Using two-photon microscopy and optogenetics, I have shown that transient increases and decreases of dopamine modulate plasticity of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-expressing cells in the nucleus accumbens, respectively. At the behavioral level, I characterized that these D1 and D2 cells cooperatively tune learning by generalization and discrimination learning. Interestingly, disturbance of the dopamine signaling impaired D2 cell plasticity and discrimination learning, which was analogous to salience misattribution seen in subjects with schizophrenia.

Coordinated activity across networks of neurons is a hallmark of both resting and active behavioral states in many species, including worms, flies, fish, mice and humans. These global patterns alter energy metabolism in the brain over seconds to hours, making oxygen consumption and glucose uptake widely used proxies of neural activity. However, whether changes in neural activity are causally related to changes in metabolic flux in intact circuits on the sub-second timescales associated with behavior, is unclear. Moreover, it is unclear whether differences between rest and action are associated with spatiotemporally structured changes in neuronal energy metabolism at the subcellular level. My work combines two-photon microscopy across the fruit fly brain with sensors that allow simultaneous measurements of neural activity and metabolic flux, across both resting and active behavioral states. It demonstrates that neural activity drives changes in metabolic flux, creating a tight coupling between these signals that can be measured across large-scale brain networks. Further, using local optogenetic perturbation, I show that even transient increases in neural activity result in rapid and persistent increases in cytosolic ATP, suggesting that neuronal metabolism predictively allocates resources to meet the energy demands of future neural activity. Finally, these studies reveal that the initiation of even minimal behavioral movements causes large-scale changes in the pattern of neural activity and energy metabolism, revealing unexpectedly widespread engagement of the central brain.

During sexual behavior, copulation related sensory information and modulatory signals from the brain must be integrated and converted into the motor and secretory outputs that characterize ejaculation (Lenschow and Lima, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2020). Studies in humans and rats suggest the existence of interneurons in the lumbar spinal cord that mediates that step: the spinal ejaculation generator (SEG). My work aimed at gaining mechanistic insights about the neuronal circuits controlling ejaculation thereby applying cutting-edge techniques. More specifically, we mapped anatomically and functionally the spinal circuit for ejaculation starting from the main muscle being involved in sperm expulsion: the bulbospongiosus muscle (BSM). Combining viral tracing strategies with electrophysiology, we specifically show that the BSM motoneurons receive direct synaptic input from a group of interneurons located in between lumbar segment 2 and 3 and expressing the peptide galanin. Electrically and optogenetically activating the galanin positive cells (the SEG) lead to the activation of the motoneurons innervating the BSM and the muscle itself. Finally, inhibition of SEG cells using DREADDs (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) in sexual behaving animals is currently conducted to reveal whether ejaculation can be prevented.

Social interactions such as mating and fighting are driven by internal emotional states. How can we study internal states of an animal when it cannot tell us its subjective feelings? Especially when the meaning of the animal’s behavior is not clear to us, can we understand the underlying internal states of the animal? In this talk, I will introduce our recent work in which we used male mounting behavior in mice as an example to understand the underlying internal state of the animals. In many animal species, males exhibit mounting behavior toward females as part of the mating behavior repertoire. Interestingly, males also frequently show mounting behavior toward other males of the same species. It is not clear what the underlying motivation is - whether it is reproductive in nature or something distinct. Through detailed analysis of video and audio recordings during social interactions, we found that while male-directed and female-directed mounting behaviors are motorically similar, they can be distinguished by both the presence of ultrasonic vocalization during female-directed mounting (reproductive mounting) and the display of aggression following male-directed mounting (aggressive mounting). Using optogenetics, we further identified genetically defined neural populations in the medial preoptic area (MPOA) that mediate reproductive mounting and the ventrolateral ventromedial hypothalamus (VMHvl) that mediate aggressive mounting. In vivo microendocsopic imaging in MPOA and VMHvl revealed distinct neural ensembles that mainly encode either a reproductive or an aggressive state during which male or female directed mounting occurs. Together, these findings demonstrate that internal states are represented in the hypothalamus and that motorically similar behaviors exhibited under different contexts may reflect distinct internal states.

The hippocampal formation has been implicated in both cognitive functions as well as the sensing and control of endocrine states. To identify a candidate activity pattern which may link such disparate functions, we simultaneously measured electrophysiological activity from the hippocampus and interstitial glucose concentrations in the body of freely behaving rats. We found that clusters of sharp wave-ripples (SPW-Rs) recorded from both dorsal and ventral hippocampus reliably predicted a decrease in peripheral glucose concentrations within ~10 minutes. This correlation was less dependent on circadian, ultradian, and meal-triggered fluctuations, it could be mimicked with optogenetically induced ripples, and was attenuated by pharmacogenetically suppressing activity of the lateral septum, the major conduit between the hippocampus and subcortical structures. Our findings demonstrate that a novel function of the SPW-R is to modulate peripheral glucose homeostasis and offer a mechanism for the link between sleep disruption and blood glucose dysregulation seen in type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Animals constantly modify their behavior through experience. Flexible behavior is key to our ability to adapt to the ever-changing environment. My laboratory is interested in studying the activity of neuronal ensembles in behaving animals, and how it changes with learning. We have recently set up a paradigm where mice learn to associate sensory information (two different odors) to motor outputs (lick vs no-lick) under head-fixation. We combined this with two-photon calcium imaging, which can monitor the activity of a microcircuit of many tens of neurons simultaneously from a small area of the brain. Imaging the motor cortex during the learning of this task revealed neurons with diverse task-related response types. Intriguingly, different response types were spatially intermingled; even immediately adjacent neurons often had very different response types. As the mouse learned the task under the microscope, the activity coupling of neurons with similar response types specifically increased, even though they are intermingled with neurons with dissimilar response types. This suggests that intermingled subnetworks of functionally-related neurons form in a learning-related way, an observation that became possible with our cutting-edge technique combining imaging and behavior. We are working to extend this study. How plastic are neuronal microcircuits during other forms of learning? How plastic are they in other parts of the brain? What are the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the microcircuit plasticity? Are the observed activity and plasticity required for learning? How does the activity of identified individual neurons change over days to weeks? We are asking these questions, combining a variety of techniques including in vivo two-photon imaging, optogenetics, electrophysiology, genetics and behavior.

Over 60 years of research has established that medial temporal lobe structures, including the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, are necessary for the formation of episodic memories (i.e. memories of specific personal events that occur in spatial and temporal context). While prior work to establish the neural mechanisms underlying episodic memory has largely focused on questions related spatial context, recently we have begun to investigate how these brain structures could be involved in encoding aspects of temporal context. In particular, we have focused on how medial entorhinal cortex, a structure well known for its role in spatial memory, may also be involved in encoding interval time. To answer this question we have developed an instrumental paradigm for head-fixed mice that requires both immobile interval timing and locomotion-dependent navigation behavior. By combining this behavioral paradigm with large-scale cellular resolution functional imaging and optogenetic-mediated inactivation, our results suggest that MEC is required for learning of interval timing behavior and that interval timing could be mediated through regular, sequential neural activity of a distinct subpopulation of neurons in MEC that encode elapsed time during periods of immobility (Heys and Dombeck, 2018; Heys et al, 2020; Issa et al., 2020). In this talk, I will discuss these findings and discuss our on-going work to investigate the principles underlying the role of medial temporal lobe structures in timing behavior and episodic memory.

Broadly, the Mauro Costa-Mattioli laboratory (The MCM Lab) encompasses two complementary lines of research. The first one, more traditional but very important, aims at unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying memory formation (e.g., using state-of-the-art molecular and cell-specific genetic approaches). Learning and memory disorders can strike the brain during development (e.g., Autism Spectrum Disorders and Down Syndrome), as well as during adulthood (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease). We are interested in understanding the specific circuits and molecular pathways that are primarily targeted in these disorders and how they can be restored. To tackle these questions, we use a multidisciplinary, convergent and cross-species approach that combines mouse and fly genetics, molecular biology, electrophysiology, stem cell biology, optogenetics and behavioral techniques. The second line of research, more recent and relatively unexplored, is focused on understanding how gut microbes control CNS driven-behavior and brain function. Our recent discoveries, that microbes in the gut could modulate brain function and behavior in a very powerful way, have added a whole new dimension to the classic view of how complex behaviors are controlled. The unexpected findings have opened new avenues of study for us and are currently driving my lab to answer a host of new and very interesting questions: - What are the gut microbes (and metabolites) that regulate CNS-driven behaviors? Would it be possible to develop an unbiased screening method to identify specific microbes that regulate different behaviors? - If this is the case, can we identify how members of the gut microbiome (and their metabolites) mechanistically influence brain function? - What is the communication channel between the gut microbiota and the brain? Do different gut microbes use different ways to interact with the brain? - Could disruption of the gut microbial ecology cause neurodevelopmental dysfunction? If so, what is the impact of disruption in young and adult animals? - More importantly, could specific restoration of selected bacterial strains (new generation probiotics) represent a novel therapeutic approach for the targeted treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders? - Finally, can we develop microbiota-directed therapeutic foods to repair brain dysfunction in a variety of neurological disorders?

The developmental journey of cortical interneurons encounters several activity-dependent milestones. During the early postnatal period in developing mice, GABAergic neurons are transient preferential recipients of thalamic inputs and undergo activity-dependent migration arrest, wiring and programmed cell-death. But cortical GABAergic neurons are also specified by very early developmental programs. For example, the earliest born GABAergic neurons develop into hub cells coordinating spontaneous activity in hippocampal slices. Despite their importance for the emergence of sensory experience, their role in coordinating network dynamics, and the role of activity in their integration into cortical networks, the collective in vivo dynamics of GABAergic neurons during the neonatal postnatal period remain unknown. Here, I will present data related to the coordinated activity between GABAergic cells of the mouse barrel cortex and hippocampus in non-anesthetized pups using the recent development of all optical methods to record and manipulate neuronal activity in vivo. I will show that the functional structure of developing GABAergic circuits is remarkably patterned, with segregated assemblies of prospective parvalbumin neurons and highly connected hub cells, both shaped by sensory-dependent processes.

Sequential temporal ordering and patterning are key features of natural signals, used by the brain to decode stimuli and perceive them as sensory objects. Touch is one sensory modality where temporal patterning carries key information, and the rodent whisker system is a prominent model for understanding neuronal coding and plasticity underlying touch sensation. Neurons in this system are precise encoders of fluctuations in whisker dynamics down to a timescale of milliseconds, but it is not clear whether they can refine their encoding abilities as a result of learning patterned stimuli. For example, can they enhance temporal integration to become better at distinguishing sequences? To explore how cortical coding plasticity underpins sequence discrimination, we developed a task in which mice distinguished between tactile ‘word’ sequences constructed from distinct vibrations delivered to the whiskers, assembled in different orders. Animals licked to report the presence of the target sequence. Optogenetic inactivation showed that the somatosensory cortex was necessary for sequence discrimination. Two-photon imaging in layer 2/3 of the primary somatosensory “barrel” cortex (S1bf) revealed that, in well-trained animals, neurons had heterogeneous selectivity to multiple task variables including not just sensory input but also the animal’s action decision and the trial outcome (presence or absence of the predicted reward). Many neurons were activated preceding goal-directed licking, thus reflecting the animal’s learnt action in response to the target sequence; these neurons were found as soon as mice learned to associate the rewarded sequence with licking. In contrast, learning evoked smaller changes in sensory response tuning: neurons responding to stimulus features were already found in naïve mice, and training did not generate neurons with enhanced temporal integration or categorical responses. Therefore, in S1bf sequence learning results in neurons whose activity reflects the learnt association between target sequence and licking, rather than a refined representation of sensory features. Taken together with results from other laboratories, our findings suggest that neurons in sensory cortex are involved in task-specific processing and that an animal does not sense the world independently of what it needs to feel in order to guide behaviour.