Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

Computational Models of Fine-Detail and Categorical Information in Visual Working Memory: Unified or Separable Representations?

Cognition, Cognitive Psychology, Vision Science and seminar by Prof Timothy J Ricker, University of South Dakota

Hosted by Distributed WM Series

Sunday 20:00–21:00 Chicago (GMT-6)

Ended

Online

Abstract

When we remember a stimulus we rarely maintain a full fidelity representation of the observed item. Our working memory instead maintains a mixture of the observed feature values and categorical/gist information. I will discuss evidence from computational models supporting a mix of categorical and fine-detail information in working memory. Having established the need for two memory formats in working memory, I will discuss whether categorical and fine-detailed information for a stimulus are represented separately or as a single unified representation. Computational models of these two potential cognitive structures make differing predictions about the pattern of responses in visual working memory recall tests. The present study required participants to remember the orientation of stimuli for later reproduction. The pattern of responses are used to test the competing representational structures and to quantify the relative amount of fine-detailed and categorical information maintained. The effects of set size, encoding time, serial order, and response order on memory precision, categorical information, and guessing rates are also explored.
(This is a 60 min talk).

Topics

categorical informationcomputational modelsfine-detail informationguessing ratesmemory formatsmemory precisionrecall testsvisual working memory