Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

The meeting studies animal movement from individual cognition and decision-making through social coordination, populations and evolutionary change. It examines responses to extreme conditions, the effects of movement on species interactions and disease, and connections with conservation, land use and infrastructure. New tracking technologies, multiple sensor streams, onboard processing, near-real-time observations and AI-based analyses will be discussed as ways to connect mechanisms with environmental change. Animals are considered both study subjects and indicators of changing habitats. Atten

May 30 – Jun 4, 2027

Conference · Ecology

The meeting links amygdala-centered neural activity to emotional and internal states across molecules, cells, circuits, brain-wide networks and human neuroscience. Themes include motivation, reward, social behavior, threat, learning, memory, decision making, stress, addiction, pain and psychiatric disease. Basic, computational, translational and clinical researchers will discuss technologies for measuring, mapping, modelling and manipulating these mechanisms. Talks, poster sessions and discussion focus on emerging and unpublished research. Applicants need a science or engineering bachelor’s de

Jul 4–9, 2027

Conference · Neuroscience

Foundation models and synthetic data are increasingly used in scientific applications, yet the reliability of their outputs is often uncertain. This workshop investigates how model predictions and generated data can be incorporated into statistical inference without losing trustworthy uncertainty estimates. Researchers from several disciplines will study the implications of black-box models for inference and decision-making and develop methods for assessing and improving reliability.

Aug 29 – Sep 3, 2027

Workshop · Statistics

Lead analysis of large neural-population recordings collected during flexible decision-making tasks. Study distributed brain dynamics and adaptive behaviour using recordings from thousands of neurons across multiple regions.

Job · Computational Neuroscience

Takaki Komiyama will discuss how cortical circuits maintain information about the value of behavioral options across trials and transform past experience into future choices. The talk draws on longitudinal imaging and circuit manipulation in mice to examine distinct neuronal populations and local and long-range interactions in history-dependent decision-making.

Thu, Oct 8, 2026 · 19:00 UTC

Seminar · Neuroscience

The Meletis laboratory in Neuroscience offers a postdoctoral scholarship in Solna to study neuron subtypes and circuits underlying motivation and decision-making, including mouse models of stress and mood disorders. Work combines genetic and viral labelling, in vivo imaging or optogenetics, and freely moving or head-fixed behavioural experiments in circuits such as the basal ganglia, hypothalamus and dopamine system. Single-cell profiles and connectivity maps support the research. Apply through Varbi by 13 October 2026 with a CV, publication list and one-page research summary.

Closed

Grant · Neuroscience

Traditional work in the study of human reward-based learning involves designing an experimental task---often inspired by Reinforcement Learning (RL) theory---and fits a small set of computational models---often inspired by RL algorithms---to that dataset. For example, researchers often model human behavior on bandit tasks using variants of Q-learning. While this approach has been highly productive, leading to landmark discoveries such as the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis, it also has limitations. This talk focuses on the lack of generalizability of such models: Even if they close

Wed, May 20, 2026 · 15:00 UTC

Seminar · Cognition

Michael Shadlen develops an account of how thoughts become conscious, drawing on decision-making research and embodied and ecological perspectives. The conversation connects neural activity and drift-diffusion models with unconscious and conscious thought, aiming to identify tractable directions for experimental consciousness research.

Jan 28, 2026

Podcast episode · Consciousness

Xiao-Jing Wang surveys theoretical neuroscience through models of cognition, working memory and decision-making. The discussion connects his textbook with the field’s history and current research, including inhibitory-cell diversity, large-scale cortical dynamics and an explanatory approach that links mechanisms across levels rather than treating them separately.

Jul 2, 2025

Podcast episode · Neuroscience

Neural mechanisms of optimal performance

Luca Mazzucato · University of Oregon

When we attend a demanding task, our performance is poor at low arousal (when drowsy) or high arousal (when anxious), but we achieve optimal performance at intermediate arousal. This celebrated Yerkes-Dodson inverted-U law relating performance and arousal is colloquially referred to as being "in the zone." In this talk, I will elucidate the behavioral and neural mechanisms linking arousal and performance under the Yerkes-Dodson law in a mouse model. During decision-making tasks, mice express an array of discrete strategies, whereby the optimal strategy occurs at intermediate arousal, measured

Fri, May 23, 2025 · 14:00 UTC

Seminar · Neuroscience

On Idiosyncratic Biases in Decision-Making

Yonatan Loewenstein · ELSC, The Hebrew University

Why do individuals, both humans and animals, exhibit personal biases in two-alternative decision-making tasks, even when no clear reason exists to favor one alternative over another? In this talk, I will explore two competing hypotheses to explain these idiosyncratic biases. The first suggests that such tendencies arise from unique personal experiences, where past associations between actions and feedback influence future choices. The second hypothesis proposes that the bias reflects irreducible microscopic heterogeneities in the dynamics of decision-making networks. I will present experiment

Wed, Mar 5, 2025 · 16:00 UTC

Seminar · Behavioral Neuroscience

Feedback-induced dispositional changes in risk preferences

Stefano Palmintieri · Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale & École Normale Supérieure, Paris

Contrary to the original normative decision-making standpoint, empirical studies have repeatedly reported that risk preferences are affected by the disclosure of choice outcomes (feedback). Although no consensus has yet emerged regarding the properties and mechanisms of this effect, a widespread and intuitive hypothesis is that repeated feedback affects risk preferences by means of a learning effect, which alters the representation of subjective probabilities. Here, we ran a series of seven experiments (N= 538), tailored to decipher the effects of feedback on risk preferences. Our results indi

Tue, Oct 29, 2024 · 12:15 UTC

Seminar · Cognitive Psychology

Many situations rely on the accurate identification of people with whom we are unfamiliar. For example, security at airports or in police investigations require the identification of individuals from photo-ID. Yet, the identification of unfamiliar faces is error prone, even for practitioners who routinely perform this task. Indeed, even training protocols often yield no discernible improvement. The challenge of unfamiliar face identification is often thought of as a perceptual problem; however, this assumption ignores the potential role of decision-making and its contributing factors (e.g., cr

Mon, Sep 30, 2024 · 10:30 UTC

Seminar · Cognition

Neural computation is inextricably bound to decisions that must be made under time pressure and uncertainty. At the level of neural circuits, single neurons need to decide whether to spike. On longer timescales, the component circuitry needs to decide whether to reconfigure to store memories and adapt to novel situations. In this talk I will focus on two fun ideas in each of these contexts by showing how nonlinearities in neural components naturally form excitable switches that enable reliable decisions to be made in fluctuating environments. I will also issue propaganda that the kind of high

Wed, Apr 17, 2024 · 15:00 UTC

Seminar · Computational Neuroscience

Rethinking behavior in the light of evolution

Paul Cisek · University of Montreal

In theoretical neuroscience, the brain is usually described as an information processing system that encodes and manipulates representations of knowledge to produce plans of action. This view leads to a decomposition of brain functions into putative processes such as object recognition, working memory, decision-making, action planning, etc., inspiring the search for the neural correlates of these processes. However, neurophysiological data do not support many of the predictions of these classic subdivisions. Instead, there is divergence and broad distribution of functions that should be unifie

Wed, Mar 13, 2024 · 15:00 UTC

Seminar · Behavioral Neuroscience

Visual mechanisms for flexible behavior

Marlene Cohen · University of Chicago

Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the way the brain enables us to act on the sensory world is its flexibility. We can make a general inference about many sensory features (rating the ripeness of mangoes or avocados) and map a single stimulus onto many choices (slicing or blending mangoes). These can be thought of as flexibly mapping many (features) to one (inference) and one (feature) to many (choices) sensory inputs to actions. Both theoretical and experimental investigations of this sort of flexible sensorimotor mapping tend to treat sensory areas as relatively static. Models typically

Fri, Jan 26, 2024 · 06:30 UTC

Seminar · Cognition

Psychology and neuroscience are increasingly looking to fine-grained analyses of decision-making behaviour, seeking to characterise not just the variation between subjects but also a subject's variability across time. When analysing the behaviour of each subject in a choice task, we ideally want to know not only when the subject has learnt the correct choice rule but also what the subject tried while learning. I introduce a simple but effective Bayesian approach to inferring the probability of different choice strategies at trial resolution. This can be used both for inferring when subjects le

Thu, Dec 7, 2023 · 12:00 UTC

Seminar · Bayesian Statistics

Movements and engagement during decision-making

Anne Churchland · University of California Los Angeles, USA

When experts are immersed in a task, a natural assumption is that their brains prioritize task-related activity. Accordingly, most efforts to understand neural activity during well-learned tasks focus on cognitive computations and task-related movements. Surprisingly, we observed that during decision-making, the cortex-wide activity of multiple cell types is dominated by movements, especially “uninstructed movements”, that are spontaneously expressed. These observations argue that animals execute expert decisions while performing richly varied, uninstructed movements that profoundly shape neu

Wed, Nov 8, 2023 · 16:00 UTC

Seminar · Behavioral Neuroscience

Higher cortical areas carry a wide range of sensory, cognitive, and motor signals supporting complex goal-directed behavior. These signals mix in heterogeneous responses of single neurons, making it difficult to untangle underlying mechanisms. I will present two approaches for revealing interpretable circuit mechanisms from heterogeneous neural responses during cognitive tasks. First, I will show a flexible nonparametric framework for simultaneously inferring population dynamics on single trials and tuning functions of individual neurons to the latent population state. When applied to recordin

Fri, Nov 3, 2023 · 07:30 UTC

Seminar · Computational Neuroscience

A unifying framework for movement control and decision making

Alaa Ahmed · University of Colorado, Boulder

To understand subjective evaluation of an option, various disciplines have quantified the interaction between reward and effort during decision making, producing an estimate of economic utility, namely the subject ‘goodness’ of an option. However, those same variables that affect the utility of an option also influence the vigor (speed) of movements to acquire it. To better understand this, we have developed a mathematical framework demonstrating how utility can influence not only the choice of what to do, but also the speed of the movement follows. I will present results demonstrating that ex

Wed, Oct 18, 2023 · 15:00 UTC

Seminar · Behavioral Neuroscience

Humans and animals are not always rational. They not only rationally exploit rewards but also explore an environment owing to their curiosity. However, the mechanism of such curiosity-driven irrational behavior is largely unknown. Here, we developed a decision-making model for a two-choice task based on the free energy principle, which is a theory integrating recognition and action selection. The model describes irrational behaviors depending on the curiosity level. We also proposed a machine learning method to decode temporal curiosity from behavioral data. By applying it to rat behavioral da

Tue, Jul 11, 2023 · 00:00 UTC

Seminar · Cognition

The Geometry of Decision-Making

Iain Couzin · University of Konstanz, Germany

Running, swimming, or flying through the world, animals are constantly making decisions while on the move—decisions that allow them to choose where to eat, where to hide, and with whom to associate. Despite this most studies have considered only on the outcome of, and time taken to make, decisions. Motion is, however, crucial in terms of how space is represented by organisms during spatial decision-making. Employing a range of new technologies, including automated tracking, computational reconstruction of sensory information, and immersive ‘holographic’ virtual reality (VR) for animals, experi

Wed, May 24, 2023 · 05:00 UTC

Seminar · Behavioral Neuroscience