Self-generated vestibular prosthetic input updates forward internal model of self-motion
Neuroscience ePoster by Kantapon Wiboonsaksakul, Charles Della Santina and Kathleen Cullen
Part of COSYNE 2023 posters, Johns Hopkins University; Biomedical Engineering; Johns Hopkins University; Johns Hopkins; Dept Biomedical Engineering
Saturday
Abstract
The brain must differentiate between externally-generated and self-generated sensory inputs to build stable perception and generate appropriate behavior. Despite recent advances in neuroprostheses, little is known about how the brain interprets prosthetic sensory input, especially when self-generated. Here, we asked: How does the brain learn to distinguish self-generated prosthetic stimulation? To do this, we leveraged the well-understood neural pathways and behavior readouts of the vestibular system. A monkey was implanted with a vestibular prosthesis that restores sensory information via nerve stimulation and trained to make coordinated eye-head gaze-shifts between horizontal targets. Each session comprised a three-block learning paradigm: baseline gaze-shifts, gaze-shifts with prosthetic stimulation, and washout without stimulation. We hypothesized that 1) prosthetic stimulation would first engage vestibular reflex pathways, resulting in truncated gaze-shifts but also that 2) the brain would then update its internal model to account for this new sensory input. Consistent with our predictions, gaze position error initially increased after stimulation onset. Furthermore, this error then exponentially decayed within ~60 trials, with early washout trials showing oppositely-directed gaze position error, indicating a central adaptation rather than simply reflex suppression. We next asked whether the observed adaptation was due to updating a forward internal model (i.e., the brain’s prediction of self-generated prosthetic sensory input) or instead was simply the result of updating the gaze controller’s inverse model (i.e., the required motor command). To do this, we tested learning in a gaze adaptation paradigm where the target was jumped forward 5. This learning, which requires mainly the updating of inverse model, demonstrated substantially slower adaptation (~300 trials). Together, our results show that the brain can quickly learn to use self-generated prosthetic input by updating its forward internal model of self-motion. Importantly, these findings provide new insights on how the brain interprets prosthetic sensory inputs to generate accurate behavior.
Topics
Details
- Session
- Poster Session II
Related ePosters
Coordinated cortico-cerebellar neural dynamics underlying neuroprosthetic learning
Mar 19, 2022Lisbon, Portugal
More in Poster Session II
All postersAn accessible hippocampal dataset for benchmarking models of cognitive mapping
Mar 11, 2023Alexandra Keinath et al.AI-driven cholinergic theory enables rapid and robust cortex-wide learning
Mar 11, 2023Maija Filipovica et al.All-Optical Investigation of Schaller Collateral Synapses in vivo
Mar 11, 2023Cynthia Rais et al.Assemblies and the k-Cap Process: The Effects of Locality on Neural Firing Dynamics
Mar 11, 2023Mirabel Reid et al.