Neuroscience seminars

Recent advances in optogenetics allow for stimulation of neurons with sub-millisecond spike jitter and single neuron selectivity. Already this precision has revealed new levels of cortical sensitivity: stimulating tens of neurons can yield changes in the mean firing rate of thousands of similarly tuned neurons. This extreme sensitivity suggests that cortical dynamics are near criticality. Criticality is often studied in neural systems as a non-equilibrium thermodynamic process in which scale-free patterns of activity, called avalanches, emerge between distinct states of spontaneous activity. While criticality is well studied, it is still unclear what these distinct states of spontaneous activity are and what responses we expect from stimulation of this activity. By answering these questions, optogenetic stimulation will become a new avenue for approaching criticality and understanding cortical dynamics. Here, for the first time, we study the effects of optogenetic-like stimulation on a model near criticality. We study a model of Inhibitory/Excitatory (I/E) Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) spiking neurons which display a region of high sensitivity as seen in experiments. We find that this region of sensitivity is, indeed, near criticality. We derive the Dynamic Mean Field Theory of this model and find that the distinct states of activity are asynchrony and synchrony. We use our theory to characterize response to various types and strengths of optogenetic stimulation. Our model and theory predict that asynchronous, near-critical dynamics can have two qualitatively different responses to stimulation: one characterized by high sensitivity, discrete event responses, and high trial-to-trial variability, and another characterized by low sensitivity, continuous responses with characteristic frequencies, and low trial-to-trial variability. While both response types may be considered near-critical in model space, networks which are closest to criticality show a hybrid of these response effects.

A wide variety of animals and some artificial agents can adapt their behavior to changing cues, contexts, and goals. But what neural network architectures support such behavioral flexibility? Agents with loosely structured network architectures and random connections can be trained over millions of trials to display flexibility in specific tasks, but many animals must adapt and learn with much less experience just to survive. Further, it has been challenging to understand how the structure of trained deep neural networks relates to their functional properties, an important objective for neuroscience. In my talk, I will use a combination of behavioral, physiological and connectomic evidence from the fly to make the case that the built-in modularity and structure of its networks incorporate key aspects of the animal’s ecological niche, enabling rapid flexibility by constraining learning to operate on a restricted parameter set. It is not unlikely that this is also a feature of many biological neural networks across other animals, large and small, and with and without vertebrae.

Neuroscientists have many questions about connectomes that revolve around the ability to compare networks. For example, comparing connectomes could help explain how neural wiring is related to individual differences, genetics, disease, development, or learning. One such question is that of bilateral symmetry: are the left and right sides of a connectome the same? Here, we investigate the bilateral symmetry of a recently presented connectome of an insect brain, the Drosophila larva. We approach this question from the perspective of two-sample testing for networks. First, we show how this question of “sameness” can be framed as a variety of different statistical hypotheses, each with different assumptions. Then, we describe test procedures for each of these hypotheses. We show how these different test procedures perform on both the observed connectome as well as a suite of synthetic perturbations to the connectome. We also point out that these tests require careful attention to parameter alignment and differences in network density in order to provide biologically meaningful results. Taken together, these results provide the first statistical characterization of bilateral symmetry for an entire brain at the single-neuron level, while also giving practical recommendations for future comparisons of connectome networks.

How do humans perceive daily objects of various features and categorize these seemingly intuitive and effortless mental representations? Prior literature focusing on the role of the inferotemporal region (IT) has revealed object category clustering that is consistent with the semantic predefined structure (superordinate, ordinate, subordinate). It has however been debated whether the neural signals in the IT regions are a reflection of such categorical hierarchy [Wen et al.,2018; Bracci et al., 2017]. Visual attributes of images that correlated with semantic and category dimensions may have confounded these prior results. Our study aimed to address this debate by building and comparing models using the DNN AlexNet, to explain the variance in representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM) of neural signals in the IT region. We found that mid and high level perceptual attributes of the DNN model contribute the most to neural RDMs in the IT region. Semantic categories, as in predefined structure, were moderately correlated with mid to high DNN layers (r = [0.24 - 0.36]). Variance partitioning analysis also showed that the IT neural representations were mostly explained by DNN layers, while semantic categorical RDMs brought little additional information. In light of these results, we propose future works should focus more on the specific role IT plays in facilitating the extraction and coding of visual features that lead to the emergence of categorical conceptualizations.

A recent approach to understanding the mammalian visual system is to show correspondence between the sequential stages of processing in the ventral stream with layers in a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), providing evidence that visual information is processed hierarchically, with successive stages containing ever higher-level information. However, correspondence is usually defined as shared variance between brain region and model layer. We propose that task-relevant variance is a stricter test: If a DCNN layer corresponds to a brain region, then substituting the model’s activity with brain activity should successfully drive the model’s object recognition decision. Using this approach on three datasets (human fMRI and macaque neuron firing rates) we found that in contrast to the hierarchical view, all ventral stream regions corresponded best to later model layers. That is, all regions contain high-level information about object category. We hypothesised that this is due to recurrent connections propagating high-level visual information from later regions back to early regions, in contrast to the exclusively feed-forward connectivity of DCNNs. Using task-relevant correspondence with a late DCNN layer akin to a tracer, we used Granger causal modelling to show late-DCNN correspondence in IT drives correspondence in V4. Our analysis suggests, effectively, that no ventral stream region can be appropriately characterised as ‘early’ beyond 70ms after stimulus presentation, challenging hierarchical models. More broadly, we ask what it means for a model component and brain region to correspond: beyond quantifying shared variance, we must consider the functional role in the computation. We also demonstrate that using a DCNN to decode high-level conceptual information from ventral stream produces a general mapping from brain to model activation space, which generalises to novel classes held-out from training data. This suggests future possibilities for brain-machine interface with high-level conceptual information, beyond current designs that interface with the sensorimotor periphery.

The brain exhibits a rich repertoire of oscillatory patterns organized in space, time and frequency. However, despite ever more-detailed characterizations of spectrally-resolved network patterns, the principles governing oscillatory activity at the system-level remain unclear. Here, we propose that the transient emergence of spatially organized brain rhythms are signatures of weakly stable synchronization between subsets of brain areas, naturally occurring at reduced collective frequencies due to the presence of time delays. To test this mechanism, we build a reduced network model representing interactions between local neuronal populations (with damped oscillatory response at 40Hz) coupled in the human neuroanatomical network. Following theoretical predictions, weakly stable cluster synchronization drives a rich repertoire of short-lived (or metastable) oscillatory modes, whose frequency inversely depends on the number of units, the strength of coupling and the propagation times. Despite the significant degree of reduction, we find a range of model parameters where the frequencies of collective oscillations fall in the range of typical brain rhythms, leading to an optimal fit of the power spectra of magnetoencephalographic signals from 89 heathy individuals. These findings provide a mechanistic scenario for the spontaneous emergence of frequency-specific long-range phase-coupling observed in magneto- and electroencephalographic signals as signatures of resonant modes emerging in the space-time structure of the Connectome, reinforcing the importance of incorporating realistic time delays in network models of oscillatory brain activity.

Inter-areal coherence between cortical field-potentials is a widespread phenomenon and depends on numerous behavioral and cognitive factors. It has been hypothesized that inter-areal coherence reflects phase-synchronization between local oscillations and flexibly gates communication. We reveal an alternative mechanism, where coherence results from and is not the cause of communication, and naturally emerges as a consequence of the fact that spiking activity in a sending area causes post-synaptic inputs both in the same area and in other areas. Consequently, coherence depends in a lawful manner on oscillatory power and phase-locking in a sending area and inter-areal connectivity. We show that changes in oscillatory power explain prominent changes in fronto-parietal beta-coherence with movement and memory, and LGN-V1 gamma-coherence with arousal and visual stimulation. Optogenetic silencing of a receiving area and E/I network simulations demonstrate that afferent synaptic inputs rather than spiking entrainment are the main determinant of inter-areal coherence. These findings suggest that the unique spectral profiles of different brain areas automatically give rise to large-scale inter-areal coherence patterns that follow anatomical connectivity and continuously reconfigure as a function of behavior and cognition.

A myriad of pathological changes associated with epilepsy, including the loss of specific cell types, improper expression of individual ion channels, and synaptic sprouting, can be recast as decreases in cell and circuit heterogeneity. In recent experimental work, we demonstrated that biophysical diversity is a key characteristic of human cortical pyramidal cells, and past theoretical work has shown that neuronal heterogeneity improves a neural circuit’s ability to encode information. Viewed alongside the fact that seizure is an information-poor brain state, these findings motivate the hypothesis that epileptogenesis can be recontextualized as a process where reduction in cellular heterogeneity renders neural circuits less resilient to seizure onset. By comparing whole-cell patch clamp recordings from layer 5 (L5) human cortical pyramidal neurons from epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic tissue, we present the first direct experimental evidence that a significant reduction in neural heterogeneity accompanies epilepsy. We directly implement experimentally-obtained heterogeneity levels in cortical excitatory-inhibitory (E-I) stochastic spiking network models. Low heterogeneity networks display unique dynamics typified by a sudden transition into a hyper-active and synchronous state paralleling ictogenesis. Mean-field analysis reveals a distinct mathematical structure in these networks distinguished by multi-stability. Furthermore, the mathematically characterized linearizing effect of heterogeneity on input-output response functions explains the counter-intuitive experimentally observed reduction in single-cell excitability in epileptogenic neurons. This joint experimental, computational, and mathematical study showcases that decreased neuronal heterogeneity exists in epileptogenic human cortical tissue, that this difference yields dynamical changes in neural networks paralleling ictogenesis, and that there is a fundamental explanation for these dynamics based in mathematically characterized effects of heterogeneity. These interdisciplinary results provide convincing evidence that biophysical diversity imbues neural circuits with resilience to seizure and a new lens through which to view epilepsy, the most common serious neurological disorder in the world, that could reveal new targets for clinical treatment.

We at Neuromatch 4.0 wish to open up science conferences to everyone and that is why we have included a session for kids and the young at heart. The NMC for kids has three excellent speakers from around the globe to talk about the balance system from bird butts to space: 1. Birds balance with their butts” by Bing Wen Brunton (Associate Prof of Biology at University of Washington, Seattle) 2. “The brain in motion” by Jenifer L. Campos (Associate Prof, University of Toronto) 3. “Getting ready for Mars: what happens to the brain in space?” By Elisa R Ferre (Senior Lecturer, Birkbeck University of London)

For the first time, we are holding a NMC around the globe session, a panel of computational neuroscientists working in different continents who are willing to discuss their challenges and milestones in doing science and training researchers in their home country. We hope that our panelists can share their barriers, what they define as accomplishments and how they would like the future of computational neuroscience to evolve locally and internationally with our diverse NMC audience.

Dysregulation of protein synthesis both globally and locally in neurons and astrocytes is a key feature of neurodegenerative diseases. Aberrant signalling through the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) and related Integrated Stress Response (ISR) have become major targets for neuroprotection in these disorders. In addition, other homeostatic mechanisms and stress responses, including the cold shock response, appear to regulate local translation and RNA splicing to control synapse maintenance and regeneration and can also be targeted therapeutically for neuroprotection. We have defined the role of UPR/ISR and the cold-shock response in neurodegenerative disorders and have developed translational strategies targeting them for new treatments for dementia.

Survival is predicated on the ability of an organism to respond to stress. The reliability of this response is ensured by a synaptic architecture that is relatively inflexible (i.e. hard-wired). Our work has shown that in naive animals, synapses on CRH neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus are very reluctant to modification. If animals are stressed, however, these synapses become willing to learn. This seminar will focus on mechanisms linking acute stress to metaplastic changes at glutamate synapses, and also show how stress, and these synaptic changes can be transmitted from one individual to another.

This talk will focus on the generative modelling of resting state time series or endogenous neuronal activity. I will survey developments in modelling distributed neuronal fluctuations – spectral dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for functional MRI – and how this modelling rests upon functional connectivity. The dynamics of brain connectivity has recently attracted a lot of attention among brain mappers. I will also show a novel method to identify dynamic effective connectivity using spectral DCM. Further, I will summarise the development of the next generation of DCMs towards large-scale, whole-brain schemes which are computationally inexpensive, to the other extreme of the development using more sophisticated and biophysically detailed generative models based on the canonical microcircuits.

Fiber photometry (FP) is an adaptable method for recording in vivo neural activity in freely behaving animals. It has become a popular tool in neuroscience due to its ease of use, low cost, the ability to combine FP with freely moving behavior, among other advantages. However, analysis of FP data can be a challenge for new users, especially those with a limited programming background. Here, we present Guided Photometry Analysis in Python (GuPPy), a free and open-source FP analysis tool. GuPPy is provided as a Jupyter notebook, a well-commented interactive development environment (IDE) designed to operate across platforms. GuPPy presents the user with a set of graphic user interfaces (GUIs) to load data and provide input parameters. Graphs produced by GuPPy can be exported into various image formats for integration into scientific figures. As an open-source tool, GuPPy can be modified by users with knowledge of Python to fit their specific needs.

In a famous philosophical paradox, Buridan's ass perishes because he is equally hungry and thirsty, and cannot make up his mind whether to first drink or eat. We are faced daily with the need to pick between alternatives that are equally attractive (or not) to us. What are the processes that allow us to avoid paralysis and to rapidly select between such equal options when there are no preferences or rational reasons to rely on? One solution that was offered is that although on a higher cognitive level there is symmetry between the alternatives, on a neuronal level the symmetry does not maintain. What is the nature of this asymmetry of the neuronal level? In this talk I will present experiments addressing this important phenomenon using measures of human behavior, EEG, EMG and large scale neural network modeling, and discuss mechanisms involved in the process of intention formation and execution, in the face of alternatives to choose from. Specifically, I will show results revealing the temporal dynamics of rapid intention formation and, moreover, ‘change of intention’ in a free choice picking scenario, in which the alternatives are on a par for the participant. The results suggest that even in arbitrary choices, endogenous or exogenous biases that are present in the neural system for selecting one or another option may be implicitly overruled; thus creating an implicit and non-conscious ‘change of mind’. Finally, the question is raised: in what way do such rapid implicit ‘changes of mind’ help retain one’s self-control and free-will behavior?

Classification of neurons, long viewed as a fairly boring enterprise, has emerged as a major bottleneck in analysis of neural circuits. High throughput single cell RNA-seq has provided a new way to improve the situation. We initially applied this method to mouse retina, showing that its five neuronal classes (photoreceptors, three groups of interneurons, and retinal ganglion cells) can be divided into 130 discrete types. We then applied the method to other species including human, macaque, zebrafish and chick. With the atlases in hand, we are now using them to address questions about how retinal cell types diversify, how they differ in their responses to injury and disease, and the extent to which cell classes and types are conserved among vertebrates.

Sleep is classically presented as an all-or-nothing phenomenon. Yet, there is increasing evidence showing that sleep and wakefulness can actually intermingle and that wake-like and sleep-like activity can be observed concomitantly in different brain regions. I will here explore the implications of this conception of sleep as a local phenomenon for cognition and consciousness. In the first part of my presentation, I will show how local modulations of sleep depth during sleep could support the processing of sensory information by sleepers. I will also how, under certain circumstances, sleepers can learn while sleeping but also how they can forget. In the second part, I will show how the reverse phenomenon, sleep intrusions during waking, can explain modulations of attention. I will focus in particular on modulations of subjective experience and how the local sleep framework can inform our understanding of everyday phenomena such as mind wandering and mind blanking. Through this presentation and the exploration of both sleep and wakefulness, I will seek to connect changes in neurophysiology with changes in behaviour and subjective experience.

Behavior relies on the ability of sensory systems to infer changing properties of the environment from incoming sensory stimuli. However, the demands that detecting and adjusting to changes in the environment place on a sensory system often differ from the demands associated with performing a specific behavioral task. This necessitates neural coding strategies that can dynamically balance these conflicting needs. I will discuss our ongoing theoretical work to understand how this balance can best be achieved. We connect ideas from efficient coding and Bayesian inference to ask how sensory systems should dynamically allocate limited resources when the goal is to optimally infer changing latent states of the environment, rather than reconstruct incoming stimuli. We use these ideas to explore dynamic tradeoffs between the efficiency and speed of sensory adaptation schemes, and the downstream computations that these schemes might support. Finally, we derive families of codes that balance these competing objectives, and we demonstrate their close match to experimentally-observed neural dynamics during sensory adaptation. These results provide a unifying perspective on adaptive neural dynamics across a range of sensory systems, environments, and sensory tasks.

How our senses work both separately and together involves rich computational problems. I will discuss the spatial and representational problems faced by the visual and auditory system, focusing on two issues. 1. How does the brain correct for discrepancies in the visual and auditory spatial reference frames? I will describe our recent discovery of a novel type of otoacoustic emission, the eye movement related eardrum oscillation, or EMREO (Gruters et al, PNAS 2018). 2. How does the brain encode more than one stimulus at a time? I will discuss evidence for neural time-division multiplexing, in which neural activity fluctuates across time to allow representations to encode more than one simultaneous stimulus (Caruso et al, Nat Comm 2018). These findings all emerged from experimentally testing computational models regarding spatial representations and their transformations within and across sensory pathways. Further, they speak to several general problems confronting modern neuroscience such as the hierarchical organization of brain pathways and limits on perceptual/cognitive processing.